|The Atari 2600. The first games console I ever got my |
grubby mitts on.
And something about this really bothers me.
I mean, I totally get the need for priorities here. The Web certainly has a lot more useful information (e.g. 'oral histories', online election campaigns, government portals etc.) that are useful resources and should be preserved for the future generations. And videogames... well that's just what anti-social, nerdy guys stuck in their basements/bedrooms half their lives deal with right?
I think there's something of a perception that videogames lead to brain rot in our young. Videogames have had so much bad press over the years, to talk about them in any serious forum is a bit of an anathema. Why would anyone want to preserve anything that turns kids into zombies at best, killers at worst?
The fact is, videogames are an important part of our cultural heritage. From the Lewis Chessmen to the Monopoly board, games have been an integral part of cultural life - why should videogames be treated any different?
I suspect that the aversion is not simply because of the bad connotations computer gaming conjures up in the minds of many; it's also the fact that preserving games is as difficult as preserving the web is. Games are not called 'ephemera' for nothing.
There are two main ways of preserving digital content - migration and emulation. Migration involves the conversion of files to formats supported by existing technologies, whilst emulation involves the recreation of obsolete technologies on existing computer platforms. Now both exist in the world of videogaming. Consider the most famous old games - games like PacMan and Tetris. These games will always be 'ported' to new formats and consoles because they are so hugely popular on so many levels. But what about games like 'The Perils of Rosella'? And 'Everyone's a Wally'? Such obscure titles are left to bite the dust because no one cares about them, and/or the hardware to actually play them died a couple of decades ago. Now some hard-working peeps (or geeks, as some might call them) create emulators in order to play them again on a currently existing platform. They even helpfully upload them to the web so others can play them. Is that an archive there? Yes, I think it is!
Having said all that, there is growing interest in the preservation of videogames, even if progress in the area has been slow and patchy. The National Media Museum is now housing the National Videogame Archive, which as far as I can tell collects retro consoles and gaming hardware. And the British Library is now starting its own videogame website archiving project, which aims not only to collect online gaming archives, but related gaming websites such as online walkthroughs, fanart, fanfic, and so on. There is however a limitation in what the British Library can do, as permission has to be sought from rightholders before archiving can take place, a serious shortcoming when it comes to archiving actual gaming content. Nevertheless, it's a step in the right direction, and I hope that fellow archivists across the pond and elsewhere (where licensing laws are more conducive to mass web archiving) are starting out on the same path too.